skip to Main Content

Employee Relocation Rights: Mobility Clauses, Contract Changes and Reasonable Relocation

Understanding employee relocation rights is essential for employers managing domestic or international moves. When a business requires a change of work location, employers must ensure the request is legal, fair, and clearly supported by the employee contract.  The expansion of a company into new areas is key when it comes to accessing the best markets and talent for your business, but while the advantages of employee relocation are clear, not all strategies will be welcomed by everyone involved. Supporting your employees with relocation management services should be the priority for your programme.

It’s important to remember that relocation can place significant pressure on employees, affecting their work, wellbeing and personal lives. Employers who overlook the legal aspects risk disputes, higher costs and the loss of key talent. To organise a successful corporate relocation programme, employers must know the rights of their employees inside and out.

Group of employees sitting around a conference table

Understanding Employee Relocation Rights

Employee relocation rights refer to the legal and contractual protections employees have when an employer asks them to move to a new location. These rights ensure that any relocation request is fair, reasonable, and clearly defined within the employment contract. 

Most relocation-related rights centre around the presence, or absence, of a mobility clause. A mobility clause outlines the circumstances in which an employer can request an employee to change their work location. If this clause exists, employees are generally expected to follow the relocation request, unless the move is deemed unreasonable.

Reasonable vs Unreasonable Relocation

What counts as a ‘reasonable relocation’ can vary widely. There is no strict legal definition, and what may be reasonable for one employee could be unreasonable for another, depending on family responsibilities, living situations, and personal responsibilities. An example of an unreasonable employee relocation could be:

  • Asked to move to a city or area with a higher cost of living
  • Requested to move abroad within a short amount of time
  • Relocating to the other side of the UK despite having children in school

You must consider the effect of an employee relocation on the employee’s overall quality of life. If the move would cause a decline in their quality and enjoyment of life, the relocation is likely to be classed as unreasonable.

To ensure that the relocation you are asking of your employee is reasonable, the following factors should be considered:

  • Distance to a new location: If the distance to their new location is deemed too far, this could be considered unreasonable.
  • Costs: For expensive moves, employers should consider taking on some of the relocation costs or offering a relocation package.
  • Commute: If relocation will increase the employee’s commute a considerable amount, this could be a cause for refusal.
  • Salary: Inconvenience to the employee may be a cause for a salary increase.

Amount of notice: Provide employees with ample and written notice of their relocation, with all the information they need.

Employees laughing at a computer screen in an office

What is a Mobility Clause?

A mobility clause is a provision in an employment contract that allows an employer to change an employee’s work location when necessary. A position that may require relocation typically requires employees to sign a contract containing this clause. 

Purpose of a Mobility Clause

The mobility clause exists to give employers flexibility. It allows them to:

  • Respond to business and economic changes.
  • Open or consolidate offices.
  • Support internal expansion
  • Deploy employees to locations where their skills are needed.

When a Mobility Clause applies

A mobility clause only applies when:

  • The requirement to relocate is clearly written into the employment contract.
  • The change applies to the type of work the employee performs.
  • The relocation request is reasonable in timing and impact.
  • Adequate notice and information are provided.

What if there isn’t a Mobility Clause in Place?  

When an employment contract does not contain a mobility clause, an employer cannot require an employee to relocate. However, employers retain the ability to negotiate a relocation with the employee. In this situation, both parties can mutually agree on new terms such as updated working arrangements and incentives.

If both parties cannot agree, the employer may consider redundancy. To ensure the redundancy process is fair, employers must first explore suitable alternative roles at the same location or within the new proposed location. If a suitable role is offered and the employee unreasonably refuses it, they may forfeit their entitlement to redundancy pay.

If an employer attempts to force a relocation without a contractual mobility clause, this may be seen as a fundamental breach of the employment contract. In this situation, the employee has the right to resign and claim constructive dismissal. Employers should therefore approach relocation without a mobility clause cautiously, prioritising consultation, transparency and fair negotiation.

A hand reaching to sign a contract with two other hands making talking gestures

Changing an Employee’s Contract When Relocation is Required

As mentioned above, when an employer wishes to change an employee’s work location, the employment contract must allow for relocation, unless a mutual agreement is made between the employer and the employee. 

Employers can make changes to contracts that have been previously agreed upon by the employee concerned, or a collective agreement with an association such as a trade union, or an implication, i.e., a change in long-standing practice. However, it is best practice that any changes to contracts be mutually agreed upon.

There are, however, instances where employers may try to ‘force’ changes, such as:

  • Imposing new terms on an existing contract, such as a new work location, without the consent of the employee.
  • Providing written notice under a “variation clause” to introduce relocation requirements, which can be lawful if the change is deemed ‘reasonable’.
  • Threatening dismissal if the employee does not agree to the proposed relocation terms.
  • Terminating the existing contract and offering a new one with revised relocation provisions, effectively implementing a ‘fire and rehire’. 

Statutory Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement (Fire and Rehire)

On July 18th, 2024, the Statutory Code of Practice on Dismissal and Re-engagement came into effect, providing employers and employees with practical guidance for cases commonly known as ‘fire and rehire’. Failure to comply with the Code of Practice does not create grounds for a separate claim, but tribunals must consider it in relevant cases like unfair dismissal (see below). If an employer unreasonably fails to adhere to it, tribunals can increase compensation by up to 25%.

You can read more about the Code of Practice on the UK Government’s website.

What Employees Should Do When Contract Changes Involve Relocation

Employees should always have a thorough read of their contracts before signing them, especially if the role includes a mobility clause or any requirement to relocate. Even if there are no immediate changes to working patterns, employers are required by law to outline the main conditions of employment in a written statement. Continuing with work as usual may be taken as acceptance of any changes. 

There is room for negotiation, particularly if a proposed relocation affects personal circumstances, costs, commuting time, or family life. Employees should raise any concerns as early as possible so that any contract changes related to relocation can be mutually agreed upon.

If employees are dissatisfied with proposed relocation-related changes or the result of negotiations, they can notify their employer in writing that they do not agree. Concerns and potential claims should also be outlined. They can also continue working under the old terms and simply refuse the changes proposed. Employees who are members of a union can get them to protest on their behalf. 

Check out the helpful resources on Citizens Advice if you’re unsure of any changes, including relocation clauses, in your employment contract.

Two female employees walking a corridor

Is it Possible to Force Relocation under the Employment Law?

As an employer, you cannot force an unreasonable relocation on staff members. If the relocation assignment is considered unreasonable by the employee, they can then decide to refuse to move per the company’s wishes. Without a mobility clause in the contract of employment, staff have the option to choose whether they wish to carry out the relocation or not.

A relocation allowance can help mitigate any potential conflict of interest that might arise during employment contract changes due to relocation. Employees can find out more about what a relocation allowance typically covers in our overview of relocation assistance.

Employers should only consider dismissing an employee if they are refusing a relocation that the employers consider to be reasonable. However, bear in mind that ‘reasonable’ is a subjective term

If your HR department or global mobility team needs extra assistance providing Employee Relocation Services, Gerson Relocation can help. Get a quote with us today.

Employee Relocation Rights FAQs

Is it Possible to Force Relocation under the Employment Law?

As an employer, you cannot force an unreasonable relocation on staff members. If the relocation assignment is considered unreasonable by the employee, they can then decide to refuse to move per the company’s wishes. Without a mobility clause in the contract of employment, staff have the option to choose whether they wish to carry out the relocation or not.

A relocation allowance can help mitigate any potential conflict of interest that might arise during employment contract changes due to relocation.

Employers should only consider dismissing an employee if they are refusing a relocation that the employers consider to be reasonable. However, bear in mind that ‘reasonable’ is a subjective term.

What is a reasonable distance for relocation?

There is no fixed legal distance that is automatically classed as reasonable. Instead, it depends on the individual circumstances of the employee and the role. Because each employee’s situation is different, this must be considered on a case-by-case basis. For a detailed explanation, see our Reasonable vs Unreasonable Relocation section.

Can an employee refuse a relocation request?

Employees can refuse a relocation request if it is unreasonable or if there is no mobility clause in their contract. Employees may negotiate terms or raise concerns in writing.

What risks do employers face if relocation is forced?

Forcing relocation without agreement or reasonableness can lead to  severe legal, financial and operational risks such as:

  • Claims of constructive dismissal, unfair dismissal or discrimination
  • Employee dissatisfaction and lower productivity
  • Damage to the employer’s reputation

Should employers provide relocation packages?

While not always required, relocation packages help make moves reasonable and support employee well-being. Packages may include temporary housing, travel allowances or salary adjustments to offset inconvenience.

If your HR department or global mobility team needs extra assistance in providing Employee Relocation Services, Gerson Relocation can help. Get a quote with us today.

HOW CAN WE HELP?

Interested in learning more about our Relocation Services?

Get in touch, we'll be happy to discuss the relocation options available to you and your company.

Back To Top